Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

California Land Use Law & Policy Reporter

December 2010

Volume 20, Number 3 December 2010

FEATURE ARTICLE

Finding the Missing Link of Toxic Torts: Using ‘Cottle’ Orders to Determine Causation by Gene Tanaka, Best Best 67

LAND USE NEWS

California Environmental Quality Act Amendments Signed Into Law, Effective Immediately72

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

U.S. Bureau of Land Management Approves Large-Scale Solar Power Project in Riverside County74

LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING

Federal Judge Orders Review of Polar Bear’s Threatened Status under Endangered Species Act75

State Court Judge Orders California Fish and Game Commission to Consider Listing American Pika as Endangered76

RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

Circuit Court of Appeals:

Ninth Circuit Upholds U.S. Forest Service’s Post-Wildfire Logging Activity in Plumas National Forest78

Earth Island Institute v. Carlton, ___F.3d___, Case No. 09-16914 (9th Cir. Nov. 8, 2010).

Ninth Circuit Holds Attorney’s Fees under Equal Access to Justice Act Are Not Available for Claims in a Grazing Permit Renewal Proceeding80

Western Watersheds Project v. Interior Board of Land Appeals, ___F.3d___, Case No. 09-35708 (9th Cir. Oct. 12, 2010).

RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS

District Court of Appeal:

Second District Finds Tenant May Recover Excess Rent Payments though Property Was Not Properly Permitted under City’s Rent Stabilization Ordin-

ance82

Carter v. Cohen, 188 Cal.App.4th 1038 (2nd Dist. 2010).

First District Distinguishes Key Property Tax Case—Finds Plaintiff Who Is Not Required to Pay a Payroll Tax Lacks Standing to Challenge that Tax84

Chiatello v. City and County of San Francisco, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. A126234 (1st Dist. Oct. 21, 2010).

First District Holds County’s Assumptions Underlying Adoption of Urban Water Management Plan Were Based on Substantial Evidence85

Sonoma County Water Coalition v. Sonoma County Water Agency, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. A124556 (1st Dist. Oct. 8, 2010).

After Rehearing, First District Reaffirms its Holding that Exhaustion Requirement Does Not Preclude Challenge to CEQA Exemption Determination88

Tomlinson v. County of Alameda, 188 Cal.App.4th 1406 (1st Dist. 2010).

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

2010 Year End Legislative Summary90