Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

California Land Use Law & Policy Reporter

May 2022

Volume 31, Number 8 May 2022

LAND USE NEWS

Governor Newsom’s Drought Executive Order Aims to Increase Regional Water Conservation Efforts231

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

FERC Revises Policy Statement on Natural Gas Facilities Certification to Bolster Consideration of GHG Impacts and Environmental Justice in Weighing Public Convenience and Necessity233

California Department of Water Resources Releases $29.8 Million in Funding for Friant-Kern Canal Repair Project235

RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

Circuit Court of Appeals:

Ninth Circuit Finds NEPA Document Failed to Sufficiently Analyze GHG Emissions and Climate Impacts from Proposed Mining Expansion Pro-

ject237

350 Montana v. Haaland, ___F.4th___, Case No. 20-35411 (9th Cir. Apr. 4, 2022).

Ninth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Favor of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, finding the ‘Barred Owl Removal Experiment’ Did Not Violate

NEPA238

Friends of Animals v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 28 F.4th 19 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2022).

Ninth Circuit Holds City’s Zoning Code Prohibiting Religious Assembly on Ground Floor/Street Level Violated Equal Terms Provision of the

RLUIPA241

New Harvest Christian Fellowship v. City of Salinas, 29 F.4th 596 (9th Cir. 2022).

RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS

District Court of Appeal:

First District Court Reverses Decision Adopting Limited Interpretation of Judgment and Related Denial of Attorney’s Fee Motion244

Community Venture Partners v. Marin County Open Space District, Unpub., Case Nos A161851 & A162374 (1st Dist. Mar. 28, 2022).

Fourth District Court Finds Petitioner Residents Entitled to Attorney’s Fees in Connection with Housing Element Lawsuit246

Garcia v. City of Desert Hot Springs, Unpub., Case No. E075523 (4th Dist. Mar. 16, 2022).

First District Court Reverses Project Approval and EIR Certification Based on Inadequacy of ‘No Project’ Alternative Discussion247

Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore, ___Cal.App.5th___, Case No. A161573 (1st Dist. Mar. 30, 2022).

Second District Court Finds City’s Selection of Additional Alternative After Circulated Final EIR Did Not Render Description of Project ‘Unsta-

ble’249

Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. City of Los Angeles, ___Cal.App.5th___, Case No. B301374 (2nd Dist. Mar. 30, 20222).

Second District Court Upholds Award of Attorney’s Fees to CEQA Petitioner in Setting Aside MND and Requiring Focused EIR to Analyze Traffic

Impacts252

United Homeowners Association v. Peak Capital Investments, et al., Unpub., Case No. B308682 (2nd Dist. Mar. 24, 2022).

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE255