Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

California Water Law & Policy Reporter

April 2013

Volume 23, Number 7 April 2013

FEATURE ARTICLE

Cadillac Delta—A Northern California Perspective by Kevin M. O’Brien, Esq., Downey Brand, LLP, Sacramento, California195

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

U.S. Department of Agriculture Report Highlights How Climate Change Impacts Present New Challenges to Agriculture199

State Water Resources Control Board Releases Recommendations for Addressing Nitrates in Groundwater201

San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Publishes Revised, Stringent Screening Levels for Evaluating Contaminated Sites203

LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS

AB 145 Proposes State Water Resources Control Board Oversight of California State Drinking Water Act—ACWA Responds205

LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING

Environmental Groups File Lawsuit Challenging Tahoe Regional Plan

Update207

RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

Circuit Court of Appeals:

Federal Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Water District’s Takings Claim Seeking Compensation for Water Diverted for the Protection of Steelhead209

Casitas Municipal Water District v. U.S., ___F.3d___, Case No. 2012–5033 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2013).

Ninth Circuit Finds Bureau of Reclamation Actions to Reduce Irrigation Water Supplies from the CVP Not Subject to Judicial Review211

San Luis Unit Food Producers et al. v. U.S., ___F.3d___, Case No. 11-16122 (9th Cir. Mar.1, 2013).

Court of Federal Claims:

Court of Federal Claims Awards Damages to

Water Districts for Breach of Water Supply

Contracts213

Stockton East Water District v. U.S.; Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. U.S., ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 04-541L (Fed. Cl. Ct. Feb 28, 2013).

RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS

District Court of Appeal:

Third District Holds State Water Project Contract Does Not Require Power Credit Valued at Market Rate216

Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District v. California Department of Water Resources, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. C065522 (3rd Dist. Feb. 15, 2013).

Sixth District Holds EIR for U.C. Campus Expansion Project Failed to Consider Feasible Alternatives to Reduce the Project’s Impact on Water Supply218

Habitat and Watershed Caretakers v. City of Santa Cruz, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. H037545 (6th Dist. Feb. 19, 2013).

Second District, in Unpublished Decision, Finds Water Agreement Recorded as Condition of Bank Loan Creates Appurtenant Easement220

Sylvester Winery v. Feichtinger, Case No. B235939, unpub., (2nd Dist. Feb. 19, 2013).