Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

California Water Law & Policy Reporter

May 2014

Volume 24, Number 8 May 2014

FEATURE ARTICLE

The Rapanos Decision Revisited—EPA and the Corps of Engineers’ Proposed Rule Will Attempt to Clarify ‘Waters of the United States’ by Paul L. Noto, Esq., Patrick, Miller, Kropf and Noto, P.C., Aspen, Colorado and S. Chapin Lewis, Esq., Colorado215

CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS

Public Policy Institute of California Releases Report Summarizing the Cost of Addressing Water Infrastructure Needs219

Drought and Subsidence Draw Attention to the Growing Need to Better Manage California’s Groundwater Supply220

Santa Barbara Group Files Voter Initiative to Ban ‘Fracking’223

LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS

Water Rights Protection Act Passes through the House of Representatives—Moves to the Senate225

Congressional Representatives Introduce Legislation for New and Expanded California Water Storage226

Update on the 2014 California Water Bond Bills228

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

U.S Army Corps of Engineers Revisits Levee Vegetation Removal

Policy230

Changes to FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program Focus on Premium Affordability and Risk-Based Rates Modification231

LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING

Tulare Superior Court Enjoins Landowner from Pumping Groundwater for Use on Property that Does Not Overlie the Groundwater Basin234

RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

District Court:

District Court Defines ‘Imminent and Substantial Endangerment’ in RCRA Contamination Case Involving PCE at Dry Cleaning Site236

H & H Holding, L.P. v. Lee, ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 12-5433 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2014).

Court of Federal Claims:

Claims Court Rules that Denial of a Clean Water Act Section 4 Permit Constitutes a Categorical ‘Taking’ under the Lucas and Penn Central Decisions238

Lost Tree Village Corporation v. U.S., Case No. 08-117l (Fed.Cl. Mar. 14, 2014).

RECENT STATE DECISIONS

Superior Court:

Sacramento Superior Court Issues CEQA Rulings in Cases Challenging the ‘Monterey Amendments’ and Kern Water Bank240

Central Delta Water Agency et al. v. California Department of Water Resources, et al., Case 34-2010-80000561 (Sacramento Super. Ct.); Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District, et al. v. Department of Water Resources, Case 34-2010-80000703 (Sacramento Super. Ct.).