Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

Western Water Law & Policy Reporter

May 2011

Volume 15, Number 7 May 2011

FEATURE ARTICLE

Will the U.S Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers Amend the Definition of ‘Fill Material’ to Put the Pressure on Mountaintop Mining? by Richard S. Davis and Graham St. Michel, Beveridge and Diamond, P.C., Washington, D.C187

LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS

‘More Water for Our Valley Act’ Proposes Increased Congressional Direction Regarding Pumping in the Delta191

The Nevada Legislature Considers Definition of ‘Wildlife’—which Excludes Wild Horses and Burros—in Connection with the States Water Law

Statutes192

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

Draft EPA/Corps Guidance Seeks to Expand Federal Jurisdiction over Wetlands, as Congress, Courts Question Agency Authority195

Arizona DWR Prepares Map of Determinations for ‘Assured and Adequate Water Supply’196

Colorado’s Interbasin Compact Committee Submits to Governor Framework for Meeting Statewide Water Demands198

FLOOD CONTROL DEVELOPMENTS

Flood Control Management and Liability Update200

LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING

Bureau Announces More Water Mooting Motions in Consolidated Salmon Cases for Injunctive Relief to Prevent Implementation of BiOp ‘Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives’202

EPA Enters Into Proposed Consent Agreement over Alleged Clean Water Act Violations at Southeast Idaho Phosphate Mine204

JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Federal:

Ninth Circuit Finds Los Angeles County Flood Control District Liable for Discharged Pollutants in Violation of the Clean Water Act206

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles, ___F.3d___, Case No. 10-56017 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2011).

Ninth Circuit Finds California’s Regulation of Maritime Fuel Usage Not Preempted by Federal Submerged Lands Act208

Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. Goldstene, ___F.3d___, Case No. 09-17765 (9th Cir. Mar. 28, 2011).

District Court Applies Rapanos Decision’s ‘Plurality’ Standard to Hold that the Forest Service Violated the Clean Water Act210

Sequoia Forestkeeper v. U.S. Forest Service, ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. CV F 09-392 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2011).

District Court Finds Discharges into Man-Made Canal with Seasonal Flow May Violate the Clean Water Act212

U.S. v. Vierstra, ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 1:10-cr-204-REB, (D. Id. Mar. 18, 2011).