Western Water Law & Policy Reporter
July 2015
Volume 19, Number 9
July 2015
WESTERN WATER NEWS
Drought Deepens in Oregon: A Temporary Emergency or the New
Normal?251
Negotiating the Columbia River Treaty—Ecosystem Function253
California State Budget and State Water Resources Control Board Allocate Drought Relief Funding255
REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS
EPA/Corps Clean Water ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule Brings a Measure of Clarity to the Scope of the Clean Water Act257
Washington State Department of Ecology Announces Proposed Reclaimed Water Rule259
LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING
New Mexico Update—WildEarth Guardians Amends its Suit against the Bureau and Corps over Rio Grande River Operations Impacts to Endangered Rio Grande Silvery Minnow and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher262
JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Federal:
Denial of Certiorari in Texas ‘Whooping Crane Case’ Confirms Difficulty of Bringing Endangered Species Act Claims Based on Water Use’s Impact on a Habitat265
The Aransas Project v. Shaw, 756 F.3d 801 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, June 22, 2015, 576 U.S. 2 (2015).
D.C. Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Clean Water Act Case for Lack of Standing as Curable Defect Exception Did Not Apply267
National Association of Home Builders, et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., ___F.3d___, Case No. 13-5290 (D.C. Cir. May 15, 2015).
Federal Circuit Finds Claims Court Lacked Jurisdiction over Regulatory Takings Action Stemming from an Corps Denial of a Clean Water Act Permit269
Resource Investments, Inc. v. U.S., ___F.3d___, Case No. 2014-5069 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2015).
District Court Holds that Valley Fills May Constitute ‘Point Sources’ under the Clean Water
Act271
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition Inc. v. Pacahontas Land Corp., ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 3:14-11333 (S.D. W.V. May 7, 2015).
District Court Finds that the Public Trust Doctrine Does Not Allow Changing Decreed Water Rights, and the State Must Compensate when Taking such Rights273
U.S. v. Walker River Irrigation District, ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 3:73-CV-00128-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. May 28, 2015).
State:
California Court of Appeal Applies Streambed Alteration Requirements to Existing Water Diver-
sions274
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, ___CalApp.4th___, Case No. C073735 (3rd Dist. June 4, 2015).
Colorado Supreme Court Issues Decision Clarifying that State Water Conservation Board’s In-Stream Flow Decisions Are Quasi-Legislative276
Concerning Application for Water Rights of Colorado Water Conservation Bd. in the San Miguel River, 2015 CO 21, 346 P.3d 52 (Colo. 2015).