Western Water Law & Policy Reporter
October 2015
Volume 19, Number 11
October 2015
FEATURE ARTICLE
Ninth Circuit Allows Discharges from the Klamath Straits Drain without a Clean Water Act Permit, but Avoids Addressing the Validity of the Water Transfers Rule by Daniel Timmons, Esq., Marten Law, Portland, Ore
-gon315
REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS
California Department of Water Resources Issues List of Critically Drafted Groundwater Basins under the Sustainable Groundwater Management
Act319
California State Water Resources Control Board Approves General Waste Discharge Requirements for Composting Operations321
Thirty-Year-Old Water Rights Adjudication Has Resurfaced in Nevada’s Diamond Valley322
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS
New Mexico’s Congressional Delegation Introduces Legislation in Response to Toxic Wastewater Spill into Animas and San Juan Rivers.324
LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING
The Intersection of a Stock Pond, the Clean Water Act, and an EPA Enforcement Action in Fort Bridger, Wyoming326
JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Federal:
Second Circuit Affirms Narrow Reading of Force Majeure Clause in New York Oil and Gas Leases in Connection with Fracking Moratorium328
Beardslee v. Inflection Energy, LLC, ___F.3d___, Case No. 12-4897 (2nd Cir. Aug. 19, 2015).
Ninth Circuit Finds Notice of Intent to Sue the Forest Service Alleging Violations of the Endangered Species Act Sufficient330
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Rob MacWhorter, the U.S. Forest Service, ___F.3d___, Case No. 13-35453 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2015).
District Court Finds Scrap Metal Facility Discharged via Storm Water Runoff Pollutants into a Drinking Water Source in Violation of Water Quality Standards332
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 2:10-CV-01207-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015).
District Court Holds that Plaintiff’s Sixth Amended Petition Asserting Clean Water Act Claim did
not Satisfy the Notice Requirements of the Stat-
ute334
Peter Payne, et al v. U.S., ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 4:15CV246-LG-CMC (E.D. Tx. Aug. 17, 2015).
State:
Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Finality of Water Court Rulings For Purposes of Appeal336
Concerning the Application for Water Rights of East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District, 2015 CO 30M, 348 P.3d 434 (Colo. 2015).
Montana Supreme Court Requires Admission of Expert Testimony Regarding Claim of Unreasonable Interference with Senior Water Rights338
Sharbono v. Cole, 2015 MT 257 (Mt. 2015).