Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

Western Water Law & Policy Reporter

June 2018

Volume 22, Number 8 June 2018

FEATURE ARTICLE

215

WESTERN WATER NEWS

Metropolitan Water District Votes to Finance Nearly $11 Billion of California WaterFix220

Idaho Water Users Association Responds to EPA Clean Water Act Comment Request221

LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS

Two Water-Related Bond Measures Will Be Put to California Voters in

2018223

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

California Water Commission Announces Final Public Benefit Ratios for Proposed Water Storage Projects225

JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Federal:

Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment

Upholding EIS/EIR and Clean Water Act Permit for Newhall Ranch

Project227

Friends of the Santa Clara River v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ___F.3d___, Case No. 15-56337 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2018).

District Court Strikes Down Challenge to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act Enforcement of Effluent Limitations228

Clean Water Action v. Pruitt, ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 17-0817 (DLF) (D. D.C. Apr. 18, 2018).

District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Groundwater Contamination Tort Claims in the Face of

Factual Inquiry for Statute of Limitations

Defense230

Hicksville Water Dist. v. Phillips Electronics North American Corp., ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 2:17-CV-04442 (E.D. N.Y. Mar. 29, 2018).

District Court Denies Water Users’ Request for Relief from Injunction Requiring Increased Flows from Klamath Project232

Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation, ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 16-cv-4294 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2018); Yurok Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation, ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 16-cv-6863 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2018).

District Court finds TMDLs Setting a Minimum Amount of Pollutant to Be Removed From River Do Not Satisfy the Clean Water Act’s Mandate234

Natural Resources Defense Council v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ___F.Supp.3d___, Case No. 16-1861 (D. D.C. Mar. 30, 2018).

State:

Colorado Supreme Court Extends Anti-Speculation Doctrine to Designated Groundwater Replacement Plan236

Front Range Resources, LLC v. Colorado Ground Water Commission, et al., 2018 CO 25, ___P.3d___ (Colo. Apr. 9, 2018).