Western Water Law & Policy Reporter
October 2019
Volume 23, Number 11
October 2019
FEATURE ARTICLE
307
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS
New California Law Provides New Notice Requirements for PFAS Chemicals in the State’s Drinking Water312
REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries Jointly Announce Revisions to Regulations Implementing Portions of the Endangered Species
Act315
Oregon DEQ’s Revised Willamette Basin Mercury TMDL Rulemaking
Hurtles Toward Court-Ordered November 2019 Deadline316
PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS
Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions319
LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING
Fishing Groups and Tribes Challenge Biological Opinion on Klamath Project Operations324
JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Federal:
Fourth Circuit Vacates Second Incidental Take Permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline326
Defenders of Wildlife v. Wildlife Services, ___F.3d___, Case No. 18-2090 (4th Cir. July 26, 2019).
U.S. District Court Remands 2015 ‘Waters of the U.S.’ Rule to Agencies for Further Notice and Comment328
Texas v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 389 F.Supp.3d 497 (S.D. Tex. 2019).
State:
Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Water Court Jurisdiction Does Not Extend to Unadjudicated
Water Rights329
The Luskin Daughters 1996 Trust v. Young, 2019 CO 74 (Color. 2019).
Idaho Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive
Decision Regarding Federal Reserved Water Right Claims Concerning the Coeur d’Alene Tribe and Reservation332
United States, et al. v. State of Idaho, et al., ___P.3d___, Case Nos. 45381, 45382, 45383, and 45384 (Id. 2019).
Nevada Supreme Court May Continue to Exercise Equitable Powers over Water Rights Matt-
ers334
Wilson v. Happy Creek, Inc., 135 Nev.Adv.Op. 41 (Nev. 2019).