Your authoritative, multi-channel network for natural resources and environmental information since 1989 – by practioners for practitioners.

California Land Use Law & Policy Reporter

May 2014

Volume 23, Number 8 May 2014

LAND USE NEWS

IPCC Report Casts Dire Predictions for the Future as a Result of Climate Change223

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

U.S Army Corps of Engineers Revisits Levee Vegetation Removal

Policy225

LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING

Defining a ‘New Project’ for Purposes of Subsequent CEQA Review Attracts California Supreme Court’s Attention—Grants Review of Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens Decision227

RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

Circuit Court of Appeals:

Ninth Circuit Holds U.S. Department of Agriculture Was Justified in Exempting Tongass Forest from Its ‘Roadless Rule’229

Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, ___F.3d___, Case No. 11-35517 (9th Cir. Mar. 26, 2014).

District Court:

District Court Holds that Property Owners Cannot Recover for Diminution of Property Value or the ‘Stigma’ of Being Located Near a Contaminated

Site231

Mitchell McCormick, et al., v. Halliburton Company and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. CIV-11-1272-M (W.D. Okl. Mar. 31, 2014).

RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS

District Court of Appeal:

Third District Court Upholds City’s Administrative Decision Regarding Business Owner’s Compliance with Sign Requirements233

Amerco Real Estate Company v. City of West Sacramento, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. C072403 (3rd Dist. Mar. 12, 2014).

Second District Court Holds that Permit Condition from Original Permit Cannot Be Challenged in Subsequent Permit Action234

Bowman v. California Coastal Commission, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. B243015 (2nd Dist. Mar. 18, 2014).

Second District Court Upholds California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Approvals and Environmental Review for Newhall Ranch Specific Plan Project. .236

Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. B245131 (2nd Dist. Mar. 20, 2014).

When an ‘MMP’ is Not an ‘MMP’—Third District Court Holds that Rodeo Facility’s Manure Management Plan Was a ‘Normal Operation’ Entitled to CEQA Exemption238

Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. State ex rel. 14th District Agricultural Association, ___Cal.App.4th___, No. C070836 (3rd Dist. Mar. 26, 2014).

Fourth District Upholds Variance for Setback Requirement For Seaside Home; Defers to Planning Commission’s Factual Findings240

Eskland v. City of Del Mar, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. D061370 (4th Dist. Mar. 14, 2014).

Third District Court Finds State’s Pre-Condemnation Activities for the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan Constitute a ‘Taking’242

Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. C067758 (3rd Dist. Mar. 13, 2014).

RECENT STATE DECISIONS

Supreme Court of Wyoming Reverses and Remands Decision Refusing to Require Disclosure of ‘Fracking’ Chemicals244

Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, 320 P.3d 222 (Wy. Mar. 12, 2014).

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE246